For
The Diplomat, I explored differences between Russia and China’s respective approaches to building influence abroad:
There is a fundamental difference in the goals
that push Russia and China to pursue grandiose projects. Moscow frames its
project in terms of an exclusionary sphere of influence, which would confirm
Russia’s status as a global great power. It is less interested in genuine
economic integration than in the acknowledgement of its privileged status in
the post-Soviet space by what it perceives as its peers – the West and China.
As long as Moscow can gain prestige and keep up the appearance of great-power
posturing, the nuances of the implementation process do not matter much.
China’s aims related to the New Silk Road are at the opposite end of the
logical spectrum. Beijing is first and foremost interested in continuing its
economic expansion abroad. The ideas of renewing the Silk Road were framed in a
non-exclusionary way. The concept remains open for all possible participants,
from Asia through Africa to Europe. China makes no pretenses towards having a
sphere of influence – Chinese scholars have even been reminded by officials not
to compare the New Silk Road to the Marshall Plan, as the latter allegedly
demonstrates “hegemonic features.”
Russia focuses on the form of its influence –
Moscow insisted on the establishment of a legal foundation for the integration process
and its institutionalization. China cares much more about the substance. The
New Silk Road is therefore better understood as an umbrella for what remains
bilateral economic engagement. These differences help explain why Russia and
China can be expected to reconcile their respective interests in Central Asia.
Read
the whole article at The Diplomat
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.